Joo eiköhän ottelumanipulaatioteorian totuudenmukaisuus voida lyödä lukkoon.
Tässähän täsmää kaikki niihin liittyvät tekijät
:
a) pelaaja pelaa huomattavan alhaisella tasolla, otteluita ei televisioida jne
b) pelaaja saa naurettavan pientä palkkaa ja joutuu käymään siviilitöissä siinä sivussa jne
Käytännössä: eiköhän Romalta ole tilattu pari mestareiden liiga-tasuria, ja palkkioksi tullut uudet vanteet autoon. Kuka futismiljonääri parhaassa iässään ei sellaiseen suostuisi? Ihan järkevää spekulointia kaikin puolin!
A) Risks associated with sport Risk Why this is a match-fixing risk Low level of pay 1. Low-paid individuals have greater motivation to secure additional income, and would therefore be easier to recruit for match-fixing (cf. examples from Eastern Europe). 2. Low-paid individuals have less to lose if they are discovered. Failure to pay salaries Clubs in financial difficulties that are unable to pay their players’ salaries could exert their powerful position to influence players to manipulate sports events. Lack of a sense of belonging to the club Players who do not have a sufficient sense of belonging to their club care less about their club’s integrity and reputation. They would be more likely to seek personal gain. Lack of monitoring of the sports event. Lack of monitoring (e.g. media coverage, cameras, observers) would increase the opportunity for manipulation of sports outcomes because the chance of being discovered is lower than with closely-monitored events. Failure to report suspicions to the authorities, gambling operators, etc. If the sports world does not report suspicions, the gambling operators will not have sufficient information to link with gambling activities (which, viewed in isolation, could appear normal). Lack of awareness of match-fixing. - Unclear ethical rules. - Unclear regulations about involvement with match-fixing Insufficient awareness of match-fixing in the sports world reduces the likelihood of discovering any such instances. Uncertainty about the boundaries of lawful and unlawful activity (ethical rules) increases the risk of match-fixing. Uncertainty about how parties involved should behave when there is any suspicion of match-fixing can result in the matter not being taken any further. This increases the risk of instances of match-fixing not being discovered. 10 Failure to follow up on suspicions If the world of sport does not properly follow up qualitatively on suspicions, this increases the risk of match-fixing occurring. Choosing referees too early Delaying the selection of referees for as long as possible would reduce the risk of manipulation because the match fixers would not know who to involve. Unclear picture of who finances sports. If we do not know how sport is financed, it is difficult to identify/ monitor whether financing is coming from sources that offer financial support in exchange for manipulation of outcomes. Events in which players or referees can determine the outcome of the bet, without significantly affecting the overall sporting result of the match. E.g. spot fixing (who scores the first goal, who gets the first yellow card, etc.) Poor administration of the sporting organisation If the sporting organisation’s internal administration is not organized properly, the administration system and all activities performed under it will be at risk of misuse/exploitation. Lack of codes of conduct for the sport The sport is more vulnerable to manipulation if there are no sportspecific rules concerning internal management or handling of affairs. Monitoring and rules do not apply to the stakeholders If the monitoring and/or rules concerning manipulation do not apply to all key operators in the sporting sector, they can become more conducive to manipulation.
http://www.lotteriinspektionen.se/Global/nyhetsdokument/MATCH%20FIXING%20IN%20THE%20NORDIC%20COUNTRIES.PDFKirjoittanut: KIPEE
Lainaus
Eremenkon on täytynyt mielestäni olla melko oleellisessä osassa, jos kyseessä olisi joku ottelumanipulaatioon liittyvät vilpit, että tuollaisia rangaistuksia jaellaan. Lisätietoja voi etsiä vaikka Bartonin toilailuista skottien pääsarjassa.
Komppaan Monskaa, että joku aine siellä taustalla lienee todennäköisempi syy.
Lisätietoja Bartonin yhteyksistä ottelumanipulaatioihin? Käsittääkseni rikkonut Skotlannin jalkapalloliiton yleiskieltoa vedonlyönnistä - lyömällä vetoa ihan muiden joukkueiden (ja sarjojen) otteluista kuin omansa:
It emerged last month that Barton – who is suspended by Rangers after a training-ground row with team-mates – was under investigation by the SFA and the Gambling Commission after claims he had bet on Celtic to suffer a heavy defeat to Barcelona in their opening Champions League match. The statement from the SFA revealed the allegations against the 34-year-old are more extensive.
Mitenköhän tuo liittyy ottelumanipulaatioon?
